|
There are still thousands of windmill water pumping units standing in
the western U.S. Regrettably, many are inoperable. These pumpers were
very valuable for remote (off grid) sites, with the proper minimum wind
conditions, when man-power was plentiful and cheap. Windmills, though
potentially long lasting, need dedicated maintenance. The downhole leathers
require inspection and high winds can cause mechanical damage to the blades.
Parts for these mills are expensive and sometimes hard to find.
Solar water pumping systems have many advantages over windmill water
pumpers. Though the initial cost of solar powered systems can be similar
to that of windmills (however, in many cases far less!), the lifetime
costs are much lower. Windmills must be used where there is a steady,
constant wind for maximum results while solar powered pumps operate anywhere
the sun shines. Solar pumping systems can be installed in less than a
day by an individual or small crew and can be portable, while windmills
(because of the need to erect a tower) can take a larger crew a much longer
time to install. Windmills are secured to the ground and are stationary.
Solar powered water pumping systems are the modern day, upgraded version
of the windmill - using natural resources to deliver water in off grid
locations. GAS-FIRED GENERATORS VS. SOLAR ENERGY
Generators are commonly used to provide
power beyond the powerline.
We have several economic studies concerning the economics of solar versus
generators as a power choice. These studies consider all costs involved:
modules, mounting structure, pumps, miscellaneous components, installation,
operation, maintenance, yearly inspection, component replacement and salvage
value. With this we can deter-mine a life cycle cost and a present value.
One such comparison was done by the Bureau of Land Management at Battle
Mountain, Nevada, specifically comparing solar water pumping systems to
generator systems. For one 3.8 gpm system with a 275 foot design head,
the PV system cost only 64% as much over 20 years as the generator system
did over only 10 years. This remote solar site also used only 14% as many
labor hours.
In 1989 Sandia National Laboratories noted that photovoltaic pumping
systems in remote locations would often be cost effective compared to
generators, even with 5 times the initial capital cost. Low end generators,
which are initially inexpensive, require consistent maintenance and have
a design life of approximately 1,500 hours. Small to medium sized solar
pumping systems often cost less initially than a durable slow speed engine
driven generator.
Most larger pump systems cost more initially than generator systems,
but tend to be far more economical in the long run.
|
||||||||||||
|